First, legislation does not drive a change in social attitudes.
Enforcement of laws is not sufficient to explain police eye contact bad sex misuse of power.CorruptUser wrote:Another thought occurred.The basis of secularism is that the church and state are separate.The law is thus out of step with general morality at any given time.Adding volume is unlikely to make it more.The problem is not "having too many kids".We have multiple value systems operating at any given time, and the state proclaims no business in determining which of these value systems is correct.I think we can make a lot of progress in this area entirely apart from laws and acceptance.I have five siblings.As soon as a law is passed it is, in effect, out of date."Whose morality?" becomes "whose Christianity?" Is it the Anglican Church, which has never been in the majority of this country?Even if there was a universal consensus in favour of changing a piece of legislation, it would still take time for the legislative process to give effect to that will.There's going to be some significant costs here.The position is supported by a large amount of statutory and case law, and is the established position within English law.
This only raises further problems.

Homosexuality was made legal when people still did not agree with it but a few people were beginning to change their opinion.To effectively determine public policy on this basis of a fundamental Christian morality would require the active involvement of the state in church politics and the endorsement of a particular theology.The law is far more dependent on what people's sense of morality is than vice-versa, as can be seen in any purposive judicial interpretation.Who owes the duty?Statutes and cases are snapshots.Where legislative reform appears to change general attitudes, one is actually seeing simply a greater communication of a change in the general morality.To suggest otherwise is, logically speaking, to put the horse before the cart.What about the mother that doesn't know who the father is?If a sex worker gets pregnant, should the father be responsible for child support?One may counter this by arguing that this is a country of Christian heritage and institutions, and that the common good is thus defined by the intellectual underpinnings and legacy of the Christian faith.
I believe some sort of contract is involved in the Nevada ones, and I don't know if they cover the topic, but it is something you'd want to have made explicit so that folks think about it and take appropriate protective actions.
To go beyond this position raises a number of issues:.